<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170</id><updated>2011-12-26T23:23:45.582-08:00</updated><category term='C#'/><category term='C++'/><category term='Computing'/><category term='URL Routing'/><category term='Curly'/><category term='Microsoft'/><category term='Javascript'/><category term='C'/><category term='Blocks'/><category term='Brackets'/><category term='Virtual'/><category term='Memory'/><category term='Address'/><category term='Braces'/><category term='Pointer'/><category term='Routing'/><category term='IIS7'/><category term='touch computing'/><category term='smell o vision'/><category term='ASP.NET'/><category term='Override'/><category term='Computer'/><title type='text'>Why Does It Do This?</title><subtitle type='html'>"The neverending quest to figure out Why?"</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-744761430332227110</id><published>2009-04-22T23:31:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-22T23:58:11.231-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='touch computing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='smell o vision'/><title type='text'>Taste, See, Hear, Feel, and Smell - Just a Dream</title><summary type='text'>I've been thinking about the history of the television lately.  Way back then when, Philo Farnsworth invented the television.  These early televisions and cameras were simple devices.  None of them had any color and they showed us the basic things things of our world in a somewhat fuzzy view.  Yes fuzzy, remember rabbit ears?  Fast forward to the 21st century and you have HDTVs which can show </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/744761430332227110/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/04/taste-see-hear-feel-and-smell-just.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/744761430332227110'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/744761430332227110'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/04/taste-see-hear-feel-and-smell-just.html' title='Taste, See, Hear, Feel, and Smell - Just a Dream'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-884605272444091364</id><published>2009-03-12T18:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T20:54:38.547-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Routing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ASP.NET'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='URL Routing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IIS7'/><title type='text'>ASP.NET &amp; IIS7 : URL Routing + IHTTPHandler + Session State? Part 2!  - runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests</title><summary type='text'>In a previous post, I wrote about URL Routing and how it affects Session State.  I also mentioned about removing the preCondition=”managedHandler” attribute.  While upgrading some of my older website projects from 3rd Party URL Re-Writing mechanism to URL Routing, I noticed that Session State works without doing the managedHandler.  I was curious why so I did some digging and noticed this in the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/884605272444091364/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/03/aspnet-iis7-url-routing-ihttphandler.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/884605272444091364'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/884605272444091364'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/03/aspnet-iis7-url-routing-ihttphandler.html' title='ASP.NET &amp; IIS7 : URL Routing + IHTTPHandler + Session State? Part 2!  - runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-5591514994343223107</id><published>2009-02-26T22:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-26T23:17:47.908-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='C'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Computer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Address'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Memory'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pointer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='C++'/><title type='text'>Beauty of Computing : Memory, Addresses, and Pointers</title><summary type='text'>Computers are interesting tools which can do a lot of things.  They can add, subtract, multiply, divide, and do basically any type of mathematical calculation.  One of the central parts of a computer is memory.  You can think of a computer's memory as a gigantic row of boxes.  Let's say there are 65,000 rows.  Each row contains something.  For example, let's say row 1-100 contains your program.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/5591514994343223107/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/beauty-of-computing-memory-addresses.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/5591514994343223107'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/5591514994343223107'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/beauty-of-computing-memory-addresses.html' title='Beauty of Computing : Memory, Addresses, and Pointers'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-8751238506550215089</id><published>2009-02-24T01:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T03:54:09.067-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Virtual'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='C#'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Override'/><title type='text'>Virtual vs Override vs Regular Methods in C#</title><summary type='text'>In the world of C#, one of the biggest FAQ is what is the difference between a method marked as override and a method marked marked as virtual.  The answer to this question is actually 10x easier when you think about how C# works.  C# works by an automated compiler known as the CLR (in .NET implementation) where things are decided at compile time (when you build a program) or at run time (when </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/8751238506550215089/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/virtual-vs-override-vs-regular-methods.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/8751238506550215089'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/8751238506550215089'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/virtual-vs-override-vs-regular-methods.html' title='Virtual vs Override vs Regular Methods in C#'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-7409542988134906273</id><published>2009-02-23T22:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T03:49:40.562-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Javascript'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Blocks'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Curly'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Braces'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='C#'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Brackets'/><title type='text'>The Simple Block Bracket { } : How Scope Can Be Created</title><summary type='text'>Local variables is one of the most powerful things in programming today.  Although the concept is old, it is still one thing all programmers must keep in mind on how to use.  Today, I'll talk about the stuff between the bracket ({}) called a block (also commonly called curly braces) and how it can allow you access to local variables.   In C# you normally would write a function like this:public </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/7409542988134906273/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/simple-block-bracket-how-scope-can-be.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/7409542988134906273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/7409542988134906273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2009/02/simple-block-bracket-how-scope-can-be.html' title='The Simple Block Bracket { } : How Scope Can Be Created'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7574902720762260170.post-3993969749541688239</id><published>2008-12-12T04:09:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T20:57:13.950-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ASP.NET'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IIS7'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Microsoft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Computing'/><title type='text'>ASP.NET &amp; IIS7 : URL Routing + IHTTPHandler + Session State?</title><summary type='text'>URL Routing is one of the newest addition Microsoft has added to ASP.NET. There’s quite a lot of information on the web that talks and explains it. Today though, I found a problem with it that I’ve been trying to figure out, but so far I only came up with a solution that doesn’t make any sense.Let’s first talk about URL Routing &amp; IIS7. To start a URL Route, we must first fill a RouteTable with </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/feeds/3993969749541688239/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2008/12/aspnet-iis7-url-routing-ihttphandler.html#comment-form' title='8 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/3993969749541688239'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7574902720762260170/posts/default/3993969749541688239'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.wdoenterprises.com/2008/12/aspnet-iis7-url-routing-ihttphandler.html' title='ASP.NET &amp; IIS7 : URL Routing + IHTTPHandler + Session State?'/><author><name>W</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07036882278970073311</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>8</thr:total></entry></feed>
